lists

Off the top of my head, acknowledging one's occasional guilt to prevent
Barbequed Phil...

I think we're alright as we are as long as we all (Guilty as charged M'Lud)
watch what we say.

Replies could be goverened a little better
- when confronted with a inbox of messages on the same subject combining your
replies in one mail like thus:

Adam of Bob wrote:
> blah
Then your reply

Then Nickwa wrote:
>> blah blah blah
> even more blah
Then your reply to that pt.

- Only quote what you need to ?

Again guilty as charged on occasions but I've downloaded my mail and found 6
consecutive replies from one person to diffrent bits of threads recently with
one line replies in ...

Try and say stuff that is vaguely on topic - ie sci fi or the business of the
society ? Are the gossip\test\survery things best confined to people you know
rather than then soc as a whole ?

And no CAPS LOCK unless you really mean to SHOUT please.

Nick - send the rules round again - I could do with a laugh (you know the line
in question) and emphasise the usage ?

Possibly it's all a reflection on a current dearth of good Science Fiction and a
lack of controversial subject material. We haven't had a good flame war since
the Crusade is rubbish debate. Which it isn't.

BTW I'm expecting a large number of cheap SW E1 figures (5 each vs 7-8 in the
shops) if anyone's interested ?
Also some comtech POTF which you can't get here.

BTW2: What did you all think of the Futurama video ?

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Philip Ayres
payres@
www.netcomuk.co.uk/~payres
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
<end>