Previously, Dave Barlow said...
This is a bit like the problem with changing actors for Dr. Who. With
each
new actor the fans cried that the series was degenerating and getting
worse, me included. having watched some of the later epsiodes again
they where not as bad as I remember them.
Doctor Who was the first show to change its main actor, wasn't it?
Batman doesn't count, really (Adam West in The Simpsons commenting
"Michelle Pfeiffer, hah! The only true Catwoman is Julie Newmar, Lee
Merriweather, and Eartha Kitt!"). So, really Dr.Who was a pioneering
show. Now, TV companies change lead actors as they like (ahem-Game On).
I never shouted out "oh, the series is degenerating!"! I kind of got
used to the whole concept of regeneration (I can remember Peter Davison
"arriving" as a kid!). OTOH, I thought the BBC was degenerating when
they fired Colin Baker and didn't even bring him back for the
regeneration sequence (they put a wig on Sly McCoy!)! Michael Grade,
however, was punished... by being made controller of Channel 4. What a
fate!
ST:V has it's flaws but it does have it's good points. The series
started
out trying to be like the original series but got bogged down in trite
morality and let's all be goody goodies. By the third season it had
corrected that, I believe because the viewing figures where so bad in
the
states. There where some plot holes so wide you could drive bus
through then but that is what you get for doing a soap opera in space.
I thought ST:TNG was a soap opera in space as well! And DS9 more so,
come to that!
Dave "Where going on a bug hunt" Barlow
Hmm... everyone (well, Simon) going on at Chris Lyth because he doesn't
bother to correct his big meaty fingers hitting Caps Lock by mistake,
and this guy can't even tell the difference between "where", "were" and
"we're"!!
Where = "what place"
Were = plural of "was" (ie. "they were")
We're = "we are"
And while I'm at it... (heh heh heh - "at it"!)
"Its" = possessive ("belonging to it")
"It's" = "it is"
Clear, everybody? I won't tolerate no more of this un-proper English,
like. Not that it really matters, but I'd like to think the country's
taxes are actually going towards an education! (Otherwise I'd feel
guilty not paying gigantic tuition fees - and that would be tantamount
to saying Labour were right to introduce them!)
Or was Dave (the other Dave) pointing out his own mistake by his last
sentence?
David Chilard, alias Grand Lord Pedanticus