This is a reply to a private message that I've decided to make public, to stir
up a bit more discussion (maybe).
Oh, I dunno.
It just sometimes gets to me.
You see, as a non-christian, I take it all a bit harder than most folk.
'Cause most people think "Ah well, if the end of the world does happen, we'll
all just go to heaven that little bit sooner".
Now modern christianity may not have the raving warmongering tendencies of its
past, or of some other contemporary religions, but I suspect it encourages a
certain apathetic attitude towards the continuation of the species. After all,
if it's all God's plan, how can it be a bad thing? Soon we'll die, and
everything will be lovely.
Now as an atheist, this really bugs me. I'm thinking "Wake up you stupid
bastards - we're destroying humanity" but no-one really seems to care.
And even though I DO care, I'm not doing anything about it either. Does this
make me a hypocrite, or just an apathetic wanker? Just because I recycle
newspapers and tin cans, do I really think this is enough?
Sometimes the futility of existance becomes a bit much, but I prefer it to the
alternatives.
And certainly if *I* was Saddam, I'd be pointing missiles full of anthrax just
upwind of the US fleet, and sending lots of people with full suitcases to
cities such as New York, Washington, Paris, and London.
So have a nice weekend, while you still can.
And the next time someone smiles and says "God Loves You", remember it's people
like that who are responsible for the pear-shape this planet is in right now.
But the reason I posted to the IFIS list, rather than to alt.manic.depressive
was to get you to muse on the way religion affects the progress of
civilisation. There are a few books that have speculated on the effects of
discovering radically different religions, but I can't think of very many.
So given my assertion that Christianity encourages a short-sightedness to the
survival of the species, what are the alternatives?
Dominic.
"When choosing between two evils, I always like to try
the one I've never tried before." [Mae West]
up a bit more discussion (maybe).
Oh, I dunno.
It just sometimes gets to me.
You see, as a non-christian, I take it all a bit harder than most folk.
'Cause most people think "Ah well, if the end of the world does happen, we'll
all just go to heaven that little bit sooner".
Now modern christianity may not have the raving warmongering tendencies of its
past, or of some other contemporary religions, but I suspect it encourages a
certain apathetic attitude towards the continuation of the species. After all,
if it's all God's plan, how can it be a bad thing? Soon we'll die, and
everything will be lovely.
Now as an atheist, this really bugs me. I'm thinking "Wake up you stupid
bastards - we're destroying humanity" but no-one really seems to care.
And even though I DO care, I'm not doing anything about it either. Does this
make me a hypocrite, or just an apathetic wanker? Just because I recycle
newspapers and tin cans, do I really think this is enough?
Sometimes the futility of existance becomes a bit much, but I prefer it to the
alternatives.
And certainly if *I* was Saddam, I'd be pointing missiles full of anthrax just
upwind of the US fleet, and sending lots of people with full suitcases to
cities such as New York, Washington, Paris, and London.
So have a nice weekend, while you still can.
And the next time someone smiles and says "God Loves You", remember it's people
like that who are responsible for the pear-shape this planet is in right now.
But the reason I posted to the IFIS list, rather than to alt.manic.depressive
was to get you to muse on the way religion affects the progress of
civilisation. There are a few books that have speculated on the effects of
discovering radically different religions, but I can't think of very many.
So given my assertion that Christianity encourages a short-sightedness to the
survival of the species, what are the alternatives?
Dominic.
"When choosing between two evils, I always like to try
the one I've never tried before." [Mae West]