Previously, Martin Greenaway (current holder of Most Quickly Flamed
After Joining List Award) said:
Two tin cans and a...! I hope this a reference to the Doctor's ability
to whip up something out of odds and ends, rather than a poke at the
special effects!
I would never have denied it, dude! That's the whole point - the Doctor
goes around interfering, that's what he does best ("Of course we should
interfere! Always do what you're good at!"). But sci-fi is to do with
science rather than just people - if it concentrates more on the people,
it's drama with sci-fi undertones (like X-Files).
The ability to destroy a planet is insignificant compared to the power
of the Force. I find your lack of faith disturbing.
Not at all - you have some valid points. And it ain't one-sided, or it
wouldn't be much of an argument (or discussion, as we like to call it).
I repeat - the definition of science fiction is fiction based in
science! Saying it is "fiction exploring the effects of technology on
humans over time" makes it sound like an essay question. After all, it
doesn't have to be "over time", does it - it's usually set in just one
time, be it contemporary or otherwise.
Something exploring the effects on humans over time would be, oh, I
dunno, maybe the Red/Blue/Green Mars books or something, 'cos at least
they go over time. Dr.Who doesn't as such explore the effects on humans
over time, as stories often contradict each other (weather control being
moved to some building on Earth in "The Seeds of Death" after being on
the Moon in "The Moonbase"), and only lunatic fans ever try to sort out
a human continuity!
Okay, people - the impact of technology on people over time: discuss.
D.Chilard
After Joining List Award) said:
Two tin cans and a...! I hope this a reference to the Doctor's ability
to whip up something out of odds and ends, rather than a poke at the
special effects!
I would never have denied it, dude! That's the whole point - the Doctor
goes around interfering, that's what he does best ("Of course we should
interfere! Always do what you're good at!"). But sci-fi is to do with
science rather than just people - if it concentrates more on the people,
it's drama with sci-fi undertones (like X-Files).
The ability to destroy a planet is insignificant compared to the power
of the Force. I find your lack of faith disturbing.
Not at all - you have some valid points. And it ain't one-sided, or it
wouldn't be much of an argument (or discussion, as we like to call it).
I repeat - the definition of science fiction is fiction based in
science! Saying it is "fiction exploring the effects of technology on
humans over time" makes it sound like an essay question. After all, it
doesn't have to be "over time", does it - it's usually set in just one
time, be it contemporary or otherwise.
Something exploring the effects on humans over time would be, oh, I
dunno, maybe the Red/Blue/Green Mars books or something, 'cos at least
they go over time. Dr.Who doesn't as such explore the effects on humans
over time, as stories often contradict each other (weather control being
moved to some building on Earth in "The Seeds of Death" after being on
the Moon in "The Moonbase"), and only lunatic fans ever try to sort out
a human continuity!
Okay, people - the impact of technology on people over time: discuss.
D.Chilard